Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 860M

AMD Radeon 860M

Radeon 860M是一款功能相当强大的 RDNA 3.5 架构 iGPU,于 2025 年初在 Krakan Point APU 中首次亮相,是 Radeon 760M.它的引擎盖下仅有一些不同之处,如更快的缓存;其 8 个 CU/WGP(512 个统一着色器)的运行频率高达 3,000 MHz。

它支持 DX12 Ultimate、光线追踪、AI 图像生成和其他现代功能,还支持许多流行的视频编解码器,首先包括 AVC、HEVC、VP9 和 AV1。与英特尔 Lunar Lake 芯片不同的是,最新加入的 VVC 编解码器不支持硬件。支持 Miracast 和 FreeSync。iGPU 可同时驱动多达 4 台显示器,分辨率高达 SUHD 4320p60。

预计 AMD 将在 2027 年之前完全支持基于 RDNA 3.5 的 GPU。

性能

其游戏性能足以在低图形设置下玩 2024 款游戏。

功耗

Krakan Point 芯片采用单芯片设计,这意味着 iGPU 与 CPU 内核采用相同的台积电 N4P 工艺制造,因此,截至 2024 年底,能效高于平均水平。

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameKrackan Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
Pipelines512 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
PredecessorRadeon 760M
CPU in Radeon 860MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 7 3508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3000 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 3508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3000 MHz
min. - max.? MHz3000 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.7 pt (8%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.05426 -98%
...
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.37 -14%
2.38 -13%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.45 -11%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.47 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.52 -8%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
2.55 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
2.56 -7%
AMD Radeon 680M
2.57 -6%
AMD FirePro W7170M
2.6 -5%
AMD Radeon 860M
2.74
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2.74 0%
2.74 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2.74 0%
2.79 2%
2.84 4%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
2.89 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2.9 6%
2.91 6%
2.97 8%
...
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
18.4 572%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 1115%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1883     avg: 2937     median: 3147 (8%)     max: 3347 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1656     avg: 2626     median: 2868 (6%)     max: 2987 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2062 -21%
2070 -21%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
2198 -16%
AMD Radeon 680M
2227 -15%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2245 -15%
2255 -14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2309 -12%
2472 -6%
2601 -1%
AMD Radeon 860M
2626
2716 3%
2766 5%
2805 7%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 8%
2864 9%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 11%
2993 14%
2995 14%
2998 14%
...
19434 640%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
46337 1665%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
22791 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
24614 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3999     avg: 6314     median: 6715 (10%)     max: 7241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4449     avg: 6910     median: 7335 (7%)     max: 7935 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
210628 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5570     avg: 5872     median: 6020 (7%)     max: 6025 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6804     avg: 10859     median: 11800 (14%)     max: 12267 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6901     avg: 10803     median: 11680 (9%)     max: 12149 Points
171.8 -98%
...
9910 -8%
9950 -8%
10005 -7%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
10020 -7%
AMD Radeon 680M
10088 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
10259 -5%
10498 -3%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
10569 -2%
10730 -1%
AMD Radeon 860M
10803
10818 0%
10952 1%
11119 3%
11171 3%
11286 4%
11305 5%
11314 5%
11361 5%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 6%
...
59943 455%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
129772 1101%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24821 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
20346 Points (11%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
18067 -11%
18096 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
18431 -9%
18618 -8%
AMD FirePro M6100
18724 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
19354 -5%
19797 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
19829 -3%
AMD Radeon 660M
20101 -1%
AMD Radeon 860M
20346
20547 1%
20575 1%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M
20876 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
21102 4%
21237 4%
21394 5%
21619 6%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
21687 7%
21740 7%
...
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
151016 642%
max:
173912 755%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
15774 Points (21%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 +
3DMark 06
14855 Points (19%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
3DMark 06
14920 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4517 points (3%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 145.7     avg: 220.9     median: 238 (14%)     max: 253 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 16.89     avg: 24.2     median: 24.1 (9%)     max: 31.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35.2     avg: 51.3     median: 51.3 (9%)     max: 67.4 fps
3.3 -94%
...
34.74 -32%
37.4 -27%
44.4 -13%
44.86 -13%
45 -12%
45.07 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 -6%
48.6 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 -4%
AMD Radeon 860M
51.3
AMD Radeon 680M
51.7 1%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 2%
53.4 4%
56 9%
59.8 17%
61.4 20%
62.4 22%
62.7 22%
62.7 22%
...
530 933%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 81.5     avg: 119.1     median: 119.1 (9%)     max: 156.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 97.2     avg: 135.5     median: 135.5 (13%)     max: 173.7 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
229.4 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
289.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
494.5 fps (4%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 230.8     median: 315 (8%)     max: 315 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 22403     avg: 24794     median: 24584 (6%)     max: 27133 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 26038     avg: 35242     median: 36748 (9%)     max: 38899 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
536 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
974 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
6397 points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 47     avg: 59.4     median: 61.5 (8%)     max: 65.9 Watt
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 54.5     avg: 71     median: 65.4 (21%)     max: 85.3 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 58     avg: 71.2     median: 65.7 (8%)     max: 84.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.181     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (1%)     max: 0.2984 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
61.3 72.9 77.2 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.1 65.2 69.6 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.7 51.8 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4 10.6 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
24.3 37.1 40.4 40.4 42.8 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.9 28.3 29.9 31 32.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.3 22.4 23.6 24.3 25.5 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.1 17.9 19.1 19.9 20.9 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
10.5
19.2
17.3
20.1
19.1
low 1920x1080
23.6 34 36 36.9 37 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.9 26.2 29 29.9 30.1 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.6 20.4 23 23.5 23.6 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3 20 22.5 22.9 23.1 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
36.8
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
88.5 165.4 171.3 177.3 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.7 65 68.2 70.8 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.3 53.9 55.7 58.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.2 45.5 45.7 48.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
97 104 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47 52 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43 47 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
52.9 66.3 73.6 77.2 77.6 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.6 52.3 58.4 59 59.7 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.9 43.4 47.7 47.8 48.6 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
40.6 66.7 78.7 83.9 85.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.6 35.5 37.9 39.2 41.5 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.5 23.7 27.1 27.4 28.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
78.2 164.8 165.9 166.4 167.5 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.9 122.6 134.9 137.9 139.5 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.7 80.4 82.1 83.4 84.8 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.8 74.2 77 78.1 78.7 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
125.1 169.9 172.5 173.2 173.8 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
113.6 153.3 157.2 157.4 160.5 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.6 57.4 70 74.7 76 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.5 22.2 27.8 28 30.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
76.7
135.9
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
72.1
134.1
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2470635011
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty37282218
Baldur's Gate 334272121
Strange Brigade151604941
Far Cry 5101504542
X-Plane 11.11705444
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark713524
Dota 2 Reborn1491177670
GTA V1631486224
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
4
3
2
3
3
1
3
4
2
4
2
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 21. 05:38:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 19 May 2025 05:31:39 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#7 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.027s

#8 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#9 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12988 +0.023s ... 0.05s

#11 got single benchmarks 12988 +0.018s ... 0.068s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.673s ... 0.741s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.741s

#15 Got 144 rows for game benchmarks. +0.027s ... 0.769s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.769s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.774s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.069s ... 0.843s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.845s

#20 return log +0s ... 0.845s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 860M graphics card

亮丽的 1,100 nit OLED,但意外的质量问题--联想 Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 评测

亮丽的 1,100 nit OLED,但意外的质量问题--联想 Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 评测

Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 是一款轻薄的日常笔记本电脑,配备 AMD Ryzen 处理器和令人印象深刻的 OLED 面板,频率为 120 Hz,最大亮度为 1,100 nits。不过,它在外壳质量方面遇到了一些意想不到的问题。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.2 kg
强劲的 AMD Zen5 CPU,配备手写笔和 OLED,价格低廉:联想 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 14AKP10 笔记本电脑评测

强劲的 AMD Zen5 CPU,配备手写笔和 OLED,价格低廉:联想 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 14AKP10 笔记本电脑评测

千美元是买家的一个重要心理价位。联想的 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 14AKP10 就低于这个价位。在这款带笔的可折叠二合一笔记本电脑中,你可以用相对较低的价格获得出色的性能、OLED 屏幕和舒适的键盘。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
90 Hz OLED,AdobeRGB - 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G10 笔记本电脑评测

90 Hz OLED,AdobeRGB - 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G10 笔记本电脑评测

联想更新了其 Yoga Pro 7,为第 10 代产品配备了 AMD 处理器以及全新的 14.5 英寸 OLED 显示屏,该显示屏甚至完全覆盖了 AdobeRGB 色彩空间,并可直接开箱校准。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.50" | 1.6 kg
联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G10 评测:创作者笔记本电脑中的 1100 nit OLED 和 AMD Zen 5

联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G10 评测:创作者笔记本电脑中的 1100 nit OLED 和 AMD Zen 5

联想推出的 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 是一款紧凑型多媒体笔记本电脑,配备 AMD 快速 Ryzen 7 处理器、120 Hz、2.8K OLED 和高达 1,100 尼特的 HDR 亮度,开箱即已校准。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
华硕 Vivobook 16 笔记本电脑评测:人工智能功能首当其冲--真正的生产力提升还是营销炒作?

华硕 Vivobook 16 笔记本电脑评测:人工智能功能首当其冲--真正的生产力提升还是营销炒作?

Vivobook 16 售价为 999 欧元,在显示质量、端口或其他功能方面可能并不出众,但新的人工智能处理器肯定会带来巨大的市场吸引力。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 16.00" | 1.9 kg

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406KA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406KA

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » 联想的新型 OLED 屏幕非常出色,但 Yoga Slim 7 14 的机身质量还有待提高

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 小心经济型变体:可折叠笔记本电脑联想 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 显示了廉价配置的风险

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop *
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop *
RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop *
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop *
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 8050S *
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Radeon RX 8040S *
Arc 140T *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Arc 130T *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

OSZAR »